1.
One other form of
evaluation was developed by Michael Patton,
(Utilization-Focused Evaluation or U-FE). It is best described as follows: “…evaluation
done for and with specific intended users for specific, intended uses” (Reiser
& Dempsey, 2012, p. 102). It
follows several steps that assesses as it goes beginning with a realistic look
at the party and its ability to be successful with U-FE. The next eight steps involve completing the
following tasks:
· Identify the
‘primary intended users and develop a working relationship with them’
· Conduct a situational analysis.
· Identify the ‘primary intended users.
· Focus the evaluation.
· Design the evaluation.
· Collect, analyze, and interpret the evaluation data.
· Continually facilitate evaluation use.
· Conduct a metaevaluation.
To be truly effective in this
type of evaluation, a person would need to be highly trained in many areas of
psychology, technology, and leadership.
The biggest advantage is that U-FE constantly assesses from beginning to
end and everything in between. Thus, it
provides thorough information.
A second form of evaluation
is Rossi’s Five Domain Evaluation Model.
Its skeletal purpose is to determine local needs, resources, and type of
program that best fits the intended objective.
But, the key portion is developing appropriate questions that lead to
the necessary answers. The five domains
are:
· Needs Assessment
· Theory Assessment
· Implementation Assessment
· Impact Assessment
· Efficiency Assessment
At the end of Rossi’s
Five-Domain Evaluation Model, it should be quite clear what direction to
follow.
Both designs can be used to
form an informational assessment of the Mt. Vernon ISD library program. But, I think U-FE would be the most
effective. It would require a serious commitment, many participants, and
a great deal of time. In the end I would
hope that the Superintendent would not find me worthy of my head on the
wall. J
2.
Asking questions
is the most important step in evaluation because otherwise the evaluation is
not focused , and the results would be scattered and ineffective. Therefore, some other effective questions
are:
· Is the school capable of completing the evaluation?
· Who would be involved in the administration of the
evaluation?
· What factors within the community could affect the
evaluation?
· What is the ultimate goal of the evaluation? Knowledge? Change of program? Instructional
strategies? Financial decisions? Etc…
· What determines success or failure?
I think U-FE can be very effective but you mention that you work in a small district with scarce resources. Do you feel there are enough highly skilled persons in the areas of psychology, technology, and leadership on your campus to carry out this evaluation effectively? It also requires a serious commitment, many participants, and a lot of time. I would be nervous to undertake such an evaluation as I don't think I'm "highly" skilled in all those areas. It also requires a serious commitment, many participants, and a great deal of time. On my campus it's hard just getting the staff to be in attendance. In my current position and campus my head would be on the wall with the other failed evaluators. However as my skills improve and I find myself with a hard-working dedicated staff I could step up and move forward with U-FE.
ReplyDeleteDinorah, I appreciate your honest remarks. In a perfect world, I would use U-FE. Sadly, I do not live in one. :)
ReplyDelete